Research & Faculty

Default Header Image

Characterization of Athabasca Lean Oil Sands and Mixed Surficial Materials: Comparison of Capillary Electrophoresis-Low Resolution Mass Spectrometry and High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry

TitleCharacterization of Athabasca Lean Oil Sands and Mixed Surficial Materials: Comparison of Capillary Electrophoresis-Low Resolution Mass Spectrometry and High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2018
AuthorsMacLennan, MS, Peru, KM, Swyngedouw, C, Fleming, I, Chen, DDY, Headley, JV
JournalRapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
Volume32
Issue9
Pagination695-702
Date Published05/2018
Abstract

RATIONALE:

Oil sands mining in Alberta, Canada, requires removal and stockpiling of considerable volumes of near-surface overburden material. This overburden includes lean oil sands (LOS) which cannot be processed economically but contain sparingly-soluble petroleum hydrocarbons and naphthenic acids, which can leach into environmental waters. In order to measure and track the leaching of dissolved constituents and distinguish industrially derived organics from naturally occurring organics in local waters, practical methods were developed for fingerprinting multiple sources of contaminated water leakage.

METHODS:

Capillary electrophoresis-positive-ion electrospray ionization-low resolution TOF mass spectrometry (CE/LRMS), high resolution negative-ion electrospray ionization Orbitrap mass spectrometry (HRMS) and conventional gas chromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID) were used to characterize porewater samples collected from within Athabasca lean oil sands (LOS) and mixed surficial materials. GC-FID was used to measure total petroleum hydrocarbon, HRMS was used to measure total naphthenic acid fraction components (NAFCs). HRMS and CE/LRMS were used to fingerprint samples according to source.

RESULTS:

The amounts of total petroleum hydrocarbon in each sample as measured by GC-FID ranged from 0.1 to 15.1 mg/L while the amounts of NAFCs as measured by HRMS ranged from 5.3 to 82.3 mg/L. Factors analysis (FA) on HRMS data visually demonstrated clustering according to sample source and was correlated to molecular formula. Low-resolution MS coupled to capillary electrophoresis separation (CE/LRMS) provides important information on NAFC isomers by adding analyte migration time data to m/z and peak intensity.

CONCLUSIONS:

Differences in measured amounts of total petroleum hydrocarbon by GC-FID and NAFC by HRMS indicate that the two methods provide complementary information about the nature of dissolved organic species in a soil or water leachate samples. NAFC molecule class Ox Sy is a possible tracer for LOS seepage. CE/LRMS provides complementary information and is a feasible and practical option for source evaluation of NAFCs in water.

DOI10.1002/rcm.8093